From a very young age, I have had a passion for law. Every day after school, after the completion of my homework assignments, I rushed into my bedroom and turned on the
television to NBC where all the law-related shows premiered. I became intrigued with the
profession of attorneys and wanted my sign-up sheet right then and there. As I grew older, I
began to understand that what I was receiving on television was not the entire package of what it means to be an attorney. I shifted from relying solely on the television version of the profession of an attorney to researching and studying the requirements of that position.
High school is where I took the initiative to actively participate in activities that could
prepare me for a future career in the field of law. In my sophomore year, I became a member of my school’s Speech & Debate team, which helped alleviate my fear of public speaking. Being on the Speech & Debate team also helped me become a more confident speaker during discussions and presentations. In my last two years of high school, I was a member of my school’s Moot Court team, which allowed me to compete with teams around the world both virtually and at different universities on the sole basis of deciphering the constitutionality of various statutes. Being a part of my school’s Moot Court team solidified my desire to become a future attorney.
In my studies, I am pursuing a bachelor’s degree in political science with the hopes of going to law school, so I have been actively tackling the conversation of diversifying law schools and the legal profession. In my political science courses, we have been covering how laws and policies from the founding of the United States that still exist today or have remnants in the legal landscape uphold beliefs and narratives projecting the message that exclusionary practices are acceptable. With my knowledge of this reality, I set out to inform others and formulate strategic plans to disrupt and dismantle the system. Given how deeply entrenched exclusionary practices are into the legal landscape, it is likely that I may not live to see a total reversal; however, I am confident that my efforts will lead to increased conversations regarding inclusion, which, in turn, leads to deliberations for the purposes of meeting the demands of the collective.
The passion I have for this line of work stems from seeing a lack of representation in the legal profession. I understand that laws are in place to protect, serve, and guide every citizen however the individuals crafting, drafting, and enforcing the laws are not reflective of the individuals who are mostly impacted by those laws. Through my studies, I learned that the legal profession's lack of inclusion is not because a certain demographic is only entering the field, rather, the reason is linked to barriers of accessing test preparation, law schools, and law shifting positions for marginalized groups. For this reason, I plan to use my education as a means to create a solution to this long standing issue. I will do so by being an active voice in my community on the dangers of a non-inclusive and non-accessible legal field. I do not only want to use my voice but my ability to organize and execute. I would like to create a pipeline program for underrepresented individuals in the legal profession that provides them with resources to apply to law school, succeed in law school, and thrive in the legal field. Over time this pipeline program will aid in bridging the gap as underrepresented groups in the legal field will begin to occupy more spaces in turn leading to more equity and justice. Having a more inclusive legal field will open doors for more spaces to be inclusive. Each day I live I vow to push for a more inclusive legal field as laws affect every facet of one’s life. This requires individuals in positions of power to advocate on one’s behalf but that is impossible if there is no one there to share one’s reality.