“To what extent do agree with the claim that ‘there’s a world of difference between truth and fact’ (Maya Angelou)?" I stared at this question for quite a while. For our TOK essay, we were given six prompts to choose from, and I chose this one because it seemed somewhat easy. It was not. The more I stared at the question to try and reason an answer, the more I got mad at how ambiguous this question becomes. How do we define truth? How can we define fact? What is the differentiating factor and how can I even compile evidence for this philosophical question?
Where do I even begin?
I was writing this essay in contempt and with anger toward the seeming uselessness of having to write a philosophical question trying to answer some question that I thought would hardly even affect my life. It sucked. It would take a long time to write. It would take a long time to research. Why does a high schooler have to write an essay to solve an ethical and philosophical question?
Though, the more I wrote and researched, the more I realized the real purpose of making us write this question and the importance of such questions in understanding the universe: these questions forced us to make our interpretations, to advance humanities ability to think but creating different answers for us to learn from. There is not meant to be one single correct answer, rather, multiple answers to find to learn more in the pursuit of knowledge.
It is essential to understand the nature of our universe to advance humanity’s ability to think and drive to answer the problems created by this universe.
There is no stimulus to find a solution or improve our lives or seek knowledge when a problem is not presented. As humans, we are wired to solve problems. First, it was for the sake of our survival. Problem: We are dying due to the harsh weather. Solution: Make some sort of shelter. Problem: Our people are starving and it is difficult to hunt. Solution: Create farms where we plant the food to eat later.
These basic problems were the stimuli to progress humanity from hunter-gatherer tribes to civilizations where humanity was able to thrive.
However, as time passed and the secular problems such as basic amenities required to survive - and even luxuries being created for the basic problem of boredom - humanity was losing stimulus to progress. *Enter philosophers* To advance our ability to think and create ideas (solutions) we needed to look to more than just Earth. We needed philosophical problems posed by the Universe to act as a new stimulus to progress.
What is the meaning of life? How can someone lead a good and meaningful life? How can someone give meaning to life? What is the “truth?”
Unanswerable questions such as these were the exact stimulus that allowed humanity to create and invent things beyond what anyone in the past could even think possible. For example, from the question “how can we quantify the forces of the universe?” or “why did this apple fall?” came a series of mathematics and sciences that have become the modern standard for engineering and the understanding of how the world was created (still highly debated). From the question “what composes our white blood cells?” came the earliest discovery of DNA from Johann Friedrich Miescher, propelling science in the direction of genetic modification and the ability to tamper with life as we know it (whether this can be considered ethical, however, is a different question).
I’ve outlined why I believe understanding - mostly the process of attempting to understand - the Universe, but how can I, Samuel Lopez, gain understanding and enter the process of attaining knowledge to understand the Universe.
I believe the greatest thing I can do to progress my understanding of the universe is very simple: to Do. In terms of philosophy, I align with the Existentialist beliefs that the way to obtain meaning in life, one must simply experience living. By being an active participant in the Universe and this world, I can establish meaning in my life, I can create my reason for why living in this universe is worth experiencing the struggles we face.
The second way I will work to better understand the universe is something I learned while in the IB program in high school: to learn from the various wisdoms of the past and connect those wisdoms to the modern age. The past and present are connected somehow, and it is the job of the “knower” to connect the ideas of both eras of history to gain an overall view of the world, see the changes in humanity as time progressed, and connect the past not only to the present but to the future. I will do this by recording some of the things I do and some of the observations I have about the world. Simple things, even. Like the blueness of the sky, my feelings of the day, the world news, and how I feel about the world.
I believe that the understanding of the Universe is collected through the human experiences of all, rather than the work of an individual. Yes, there were individuals like Sir Isaac Newton and Plato that revolutionized humanity through their concepts like physics and philosophy, however, it was the following and usage of their ideas that truly progressed our understanding of the Universe. Had no one sought to prove or use Newton’s principles, physics would likely not be studied today. Plato’s ideas would not have been known if other humans, both in his time and in the future, did not want to learn about his teachings. Attaining an understanding of the Universe is not the job of an individual, it is the job of all humanity, and I will make sure that I can participate in such an endeavor.