I plan to pursue a legal career focused on civil litigation, and I see the nonprofit sector as one of the most meaningful ways to apply that work. At its core, the law shapes how people navigate conflict, protect their rights, and access opportunities. However, access to effective legal representation is not evenly distributed, and that imbalance has real consequences. For many individuals and communities, the outcome of a legal issue is not just about the facts of the case, but about whether they have the resources and support to advocate for themselves. That gap is what draws me toward nonprofit legal work. My interest in civil litigation comes from the structure of the work itself, but also from its potential to create tangible outcomes. Litigation is not abstract; it directly affects people's lives. In the nonprofit sector, that impact is often more immediate and necessary. Legal aid organizations and advocacy-focused nonprofits operate in spaces where representation can determine whether someone maintains housing, secures fair treatment, or is able to move forward after a dispute. Being part of that process means contributing to outcomes that extend beyond a single case. I am particularly interested in how litigation can be used not only to resolve individual disputes, but also to influence broader patters. Nonprofit legal work often exists at the intersection of individual advocacy and systemic change. A single case can highlight a recurring issue or contribute to precedent that affects future decisions. That dual impact, serving individuals while also shaping larger systems, is one of the most compelling aspects of this path. It allows legal work to function as both a direct service and a long-term tool for improvement. The nonprofit sector also reflects a different set of priorities. While private practice often centers on clients who can afford representation, nonprofit work focuses on those who might otherwise go without it. That shift changes how success is measured. It places greater emphasis on access, fairness, and meaningful outcomes rather than purely financial metrics. I am motivated by the idea of working in an environment where the purpose of the work is clear and where the value of that work is measured by its impact on people's lives. I approach this path with an understanding of the commitment it requires. Nonprofit legal work can be demanding, both intellectually and emotionally, and often operates with limited resources. At the same time, it offers a level of purpose that is difficult to replicate elsewhere. I am prepared to bring discipline, consistency, and a strong foundation in writing and analysis to this work, and to continue developing those skills throughout law school and beyond. My goal is to build a career that combines the rigor of legal practice with a clear sense of responsibility to others. Through work in the nonprofit sector, I hope to contribute to greater access to legal resources and more equitable outcomes within the systems that shape everyday life.

My interest in law comes from a strong desire to advocate for others and make a tangible difference in people's lives. I have always admired how the legal profession gives people the ability to stand up for what is right, navigate complex challenges, and create solutions that can truly change someone's future. I am drawn to the responsibility that comes with this role. It acts as a change to be someone others can rely on in difficult moments. Pursuing law feels meaningful to me because it combines advocacy with action. My goal has started to come to fruition as I have been accepted to the University of Idaho College of Law in the Fall of 2026. Looking back on my career, I want to be known for dismantling institutions that protect themselves at the expense of the entities they harm. This prevention of harm extends to not only people, but also the environment. The normalization of corporate greed has led to the destruction of the overall wellbeing of our country. Protecting those injured by these institutions is of utmost importance. Too often, preventable harm is not an accident alone; it is the product of systems designed to minimize responsibility once damage is done. I want my work to expose that pattern and make accountability impossible to avoid. I am drawn to civil litigation because the most devastating injuries are often not only caused by negligence but persistent systematic issues. People should not be too exhausted, too under-resourced, or too easily dismissed to fight back. I want to become an attorney that prevents these barriers from impacting the outcome of a case. My overall goal is to ensure that my work will make corporations less willing to treat public health or environmental damage as acceptable collateral. I do not want to be known only for what I achieve, but for the character that made those achievements possible. Being a successful attorney requires resilience, respect, and empathy. I do not want to be remembered as an unforgiving and ruthless attorney, but rather, as a kind one. I aspire to give my opponents the utmost respect and to earn a reputation built on professionalism. I want my clients to feel that, even in the most painful and intimidating points in their lives, they are finally being heard, believed, and defended with unwavering conviction. My clients should feel a sense of relief in knowing their case is in the hands of someone who takes both their pain and their trust seriously. Ultimately, I do not want to be remembered for one definitive act. I want to be remembered for the systematic change that I hope to cause and for the character that makes these accomplishments possible. Advocacy is more than just winning a case; it is about making the harm that changed a person’s life visible. Proactively addressing these harms to prevent their reoccurrence can have a profound and lasting impact on those who might otherwise be affected. I aspire to be remembered as a force that exposed wrongdoings and upheld justice.

The library always felt like a second home to me. However, as I got older, I soon learned that many members of the community wished to ban books in the collection. Books that were targeted often carried LGBTQ themes. Religious organizations petitioned that these books were pornographic. As an active reader, I could not imagine how anyone could agree to the banning of books, particularly of minor communities. When the election came up for the library board of directors, I stood at the local library and handed out flyers. I advocated for freedom of expression and speech. When the library was being attacked, I volunteered each week to help out with the children's reading program. Here, I set up child appropriate activities for the kids. These would range from reading events to small crafts. I hope to have made a positive impact on these children's view of the library. I believe that education is incredibly important during these times, as young people need to learn how to think critically for themselves. I went to a STEM Charter school where I continued to advocate for political independence and critical thinking. I developed a book club that read many of these "banned" books. Growing up in a conservative town, minorities were often looked down upon and ignored. I wanted to highlight and normalize exposure to these minority groups. Being exposed to different life experiences is incredibly important to become a well rounded person. As I have gotten older, I have made sure to use my vote and voice to advocate for the constitution. I was recently accepted into the University of Idaho College of Law for Fall of 2026. Here, I strive to become an advocate that helps those whose voices have been ignored. I am drawn to civil litigation because the most devastating injuries are often not only caused by negligence but persistent systematic issues. People should not be too exhausted, too under-resourced, or too easily dismissed to fight back. I want to become an attorney that prevents these barriers from impacting the outcome of a case. My overall goal is to ensure that my work will make corporations less willing to treat public health or environmental damage as acceptable collateral. Ultimately, I do not want to be remembered for one definitive act. I want to be remembered for the systematic change that I hope to cause and for the character that makes these accomplishments possible. Advocacy is more than just winning a case; it is about making the harm that changed a person’s life visible. Proactively addressing these harms to prevent their reoccurrence can have a profound and lasting impact on those who might otherwise be affected. I aspire to be remembered as a force that exposed wrongdoings and upheld justice.