“Colored people don’t like Little Black Sambo. Burn it. White people don't feel good about Uncle Tom’s Cabin. Burn it. Someone has written a book about tobacco and cancer of the lungs? The cigarette people are weeping? Burn the book. Serenity, Montag. Peace, Montag. Take your fight outside. Better yet, into the incinerator. Funerals are unhappy and pagan? Eliminate them, too. Five minutes after a person is dead he is on his way to the Big Flue….Forget them. Burn all, burn everything….” (Page 57)
During the mere 15-minute walk to school I took this morning, I learned that Georgian activists have been pushed into protest over the government’s decision to postpone talks about joining the E.U. and Syria’s civil war has taken on new heights due to Israel's war with Gaza. It was a lot- it always is- and, while I disagree, my morning walks frequently explain why so many people have chosen to disconnect. Unplugging from the suffering and choosing what they consider to be neutrality. Simultaneously, as the citizens of Syria and Georgia went about their morning routines, the idea of unplugging must have sounded even better to them. If only, right? Just like the wonderful words of Ray Bradbury in his novel “Fahrenheit 451” suggest, the ignorance of me and my peers truly is bliss, but only because we have the privilege to be ignorant. Those without it, like the protesters in Georgia, suffer in the unseen with nothing but their limited resources to combat it.
In the polarizing, dystopian city the story takes place in, we view this exact thing taking place with one Guy Montag. In a society that has entirely banned books, Montag is a dutiful firefighter who burns literature. At least until he receives the above lecture from his boss, Captain Beatty, it forces him to question why those he prosecutes are tied to the stories that supposedly make people so unhappy. Eventually, Montag rebels, culminating in his outburst: “Why doesn’t someone want to talk about it? We’ve started and won two atomic wars since 2022! Is it because we’re having so much fun at home that we’ve forgotten the world?” (pg. 70). Bradbury’s shocking revelation at the climax of the plot highlights the ignorance that readers themselves possess regarding the global issues in this storybook world. This ignorance is conveyed through the perspective of Montag, a character who does not have to confront or acknowledge these problems in his daily life. As a result, Bradbury demonstrates that our ignorance of the world he depicts reflects reality- ignorance afforded to us by the sheer fact that they don't affect us personally. This concept alone carries significant implications, and further analysis of Bradbury's reality at his time for writing strengthens it even further.
Written in 1953 during the horrors of the Nazi regime, we saw this exact privilege at play- a privilege leveraged for power. As genocide plagued the Jewish community, non-Jewish Germans and those in peripheral countries knew about wartime events through Nazi propaganda that pushed a simplistic narrative. They blamed the country's hardships on the 'greed' of the Jewish population and painted an image of re-education camps being used to remedy this. These falsehoods allowed the privileged population to live in blissful ignorance of what was occurring as those most directly harmed suffered one of the worst crimes in human history. One of their most infamous tactics was the burning of literature that opposed any aspect of their regime, an act that is central to the plot of Bradbury's novel, as a means to preserve that ignorance. Those who could not see the truth as it occurred had to rely on the words of others to be informed of it and, as is done in the book and frequently in our society, those in power wrote a narrative that kept people in a state of complacency. It is clear that this was the exodus for Bradbury's story but, despite the arguments of proponents, the actual commentary on this destruction isn't one we see in history books. Instead, it is entirely his own as he incorporates the added setting of a future America and the importance of advanced technology into the plot line. While pulling from the lessons the present was teaching him, he writes a cautionary tale warning us of what he believes to be coming, pushing us to take preventative actions to avoid continuing this profound historical event into the future of our country. Technology's central role in the plot also suggests that he believed that innovations in how we communicate would take his fears to a whole new level. Bradbury's fears and suspicions were not unfounded; in a world that this book was based around, we see this happening all the time.
I listen to the 15-minute podcast from NPR “Up First” every day to keep myself informed. While this makes it easier to stay updated, it can also lead to an overwhelming rush of bad news. When the people around us follow in the footsteps of the citizens in “Fahrenheit 451,” these exact problems are replicated. People globally then leave those who don't have the privilege to ignore- or even not know- what is happening to weather away in the horrors of humanity. In a day and age where his work so openly applies, we must choose to read and know. We must choose to be unhappy at the happenings of the world so those it impacts more personally can one day have the same choice. We must understand ignorance the way Ray Bradbury did so we may never be doomed to live in his projection of the future.