Too often in American society, we interlock the notion of progress with the theory of consensus–the idea that everyone in a group should agree in order to reach lasting solutions. In conversations that I’ve shared with policymakers, community leaders, and fellow agents of change, I’ve noticed that the phrase common goal is frequently echoed by my peers and mentors alike.
Throughout my term with the California Association of Student Councils (CASC), my fellow student board members and I like to say that we’re united by a common goal: to amplify the diverse and vibrant perspectives of California’s nearly 6,000,000 students.
But what I’ve learned from CASC is that it's important not to confuse a common goal with a common ideology. CASC is a non-partisan organization that gathers civically engaged change-makers from every crevice of California. Through the impactful platform that CASC provides, I’ve lobbied for Special Education legislation at the State Capitol, surrounded myself with driven peers, and forged lasting partnerships with mentors like Attorney General Rob Bonta–who sponsored my countywide proclamation for Filipino-American History Month.
What makes CASC special is the fact that no two people think the same. As a privileged kid from a gated suburbia, the way that I view the world is fundamentally different from how my friend in rural Bakersfield sees the world. The way that Vanessa, a Valley girl from SoCal, understands the world is different from how Allison, a neurodivergent student from Mountain View, perceives it. Yet, in CASC, these differences don’t divide us–they challenge us to look beyond our narrow lenses and embrace the kaleidoscope of life.
Directing CASC conferences in the past, I’ve watched delegates advocate for greater AI integration in classrooms. In my cohort, group members overwhelmingly supported the argument that AI should be harnessed to enhance education.
But rising from the back of the room, a brave student from Bakersfield offered an entirely different angle–arguing that before we discuss integration, we must first address accessibility. In his community, most students don’t even own personal devices, making AI training an impossibility.
Sometimes, it's easy to forget about the little guy–those forgotten communities on the margins. By channeling the courage to raise his voice, my friend didn’t just elevate himself, but also his entire community.
Our disagreement and subsequent compromise resulted in a more holistic proposal, which earmarked funds for strategic technology distribution AND piloted AI training workshops in targeted school districts.
With history as a touchstone and CASC as the backbone of my lived experiences, I’ve come to realize three fundamental truths; Different perspectives divide. Different perspectives disrupt. But more than anything, different perspectives drive progress.
If Rosa Parks never stays seated, what happens to the movement in Montgomery? If Fred fails to fight for his freedoms, do Japanese-Americans ever get justice? If Itliong and Chavez never defy the dictators of Delano, do immigrant inequalities intensify?
Learning from the past, I’ve noticed a pattern: people who make a lasting impression on society think differently than their contemporaries–without fear of repercussions, judgement, or transgression of the status quo.
Not long ago, I once viewed a lack of dissent as evidence of satisfaction–if people aren’t complaining, then everything must be fine, right? But whether we interrogate our government, healthcare, or education systems, nothing in our society is perfect. In order to achieve meaningful progress, we must drift from echo-chambers, realizing that differences should be celebrated and not criticized.
As an incoming Asian American Studies major at Stanford University, I will continue to use my platform to uplift invisible voices because, oftentimes, it's those voices that have the most to say.