The great generation has been through what we are currently experiencing, but even to a harsher degree. The great depression is considered the worst economic downturn in modern global history, which can be argued for some degrees. They have been on the brink and eventually had a great war occur, to which we are nearing ourselves, being closest on the nuclear clock than ever before, and seeing wars that could be potential ignition to another world War, likely to be the last with nukes being devastating to be able to destroy the world as it is now. So to the setting of us being in a different one, technically yes since it is more advance in how things go, like they didn't have cyber hackers attacking infrastructure in the 40's, the closest we had was cold war, especially with the KGB with the CCC (Chaos Computer Club). The part I disagree with is the atmosphere, with the economic disparities and political tensions, especially geopolitical being atrocious as many would describe it today. I can see the potential for us to eventually be like the Great Generation 2.0, but I feel replicating the same woes as the 1st would not dictate worthiness of such title. To start a world war is likely the end to all wars, something we want to avoid, and no I don't mean war should continue, but we shouldn't have a war devastating enough for war to no longer be possible. I feel we should not have to go to another world war to resolve most conflicts, but instead focus on the aftermath of it, the building of international relations, and not with just a few countries, but most that fall under it. We learned to make more measures for international conflicts to likely never happen again on the scale WWII did, and to build upon this connection from country to country is something humanity needs to be able to evolve and advance faster. So many resources our generation has seen now being plummeted into defense for many countries like the US, China and Germany to name some. This cannot be done too much by our generation though, as we are too young for many to have any say that would be recognized on a national scale, one of the biggest moves done was GameStop stocks with bankrupting many hedge funds for the power we can hold. Just as The Great Generation has, we need older generations will more power to recognize the faults and potential in things that can massively improve security and stability of a nation and global as well. FDR is known for being a person of mass change from traditional/conservative norms, something many of our generation associate with older generations. To have figures similar that make change based on necessity rather than political affiliation dictating things is why he was so popular. Abraham Lincoln can be put to the same degree, he wasn't fully into his party, but only moderate, and did things out of necessity, which means yes, slavery wasn't done as an option, there was incentive, being no international rivals since it would make them look bad, especially if they didn't have slavery. Most of the older generations have different necessity than younger though, as the times and adversities of some can vastly differ from others, like if you ask what a Gen X would see as a necessary change vs a Gen Z, it would likely be vastly different than a Gen Z to another Gen Z. Boomers are seen as people who think that younger generations exaggerated the severity of the situations today, bit the Great generation to me would be about as concerned as we are today. I do see the mention of older generations doing not enough as true, as the ones in power, statistically boomer, have had the easier time getting up in the world compared to later generations, and now run most of the show in government with their long gained influence. Many of us feel corruption is fueling the economy just as badly as even the Gilded Age, I mean we are seeing many antitrust trials just as the end of the Gilded Age was seeing. To call ourselves the next great generation can be hopeful, but based on current limitations, it is not seeming all that possible at the current moment. The divide between millennials and Gen-Z doesn't make it any better, my parents think we are just so terrible, yet I don't like millennials back due to their lack of action on things like politics to make changes they want, as my parents never vote. I hope to be vocal about ways of making small but growing change, as many think it is just going to big government to resolve, the easiest way to start is local. If other localities see great changes, they will likely follow suit, and likely become a domino effect. I don't want to see more bickering about this generation is this and this generation did that, we need to focus on the collective for change to make improvements, as putting blames does nothing. We should not be so focused on foreign affairs with no great incentives for the people at home, there is so much people have seen wrong here that are ignored due to focusing on foreign affairs with almost nothing to do with us. To have a strong home is what you need before focusing on a strong neighborhood, one bad house can ruin it for all, just like a house valuation.