Artificial intelligence, also known as A.I., is perceived as a blessing, although in reality, it is a curse. We rely on technology too much, in schools, jobs, and our everyday lifestyle. It has permitted us to be apposite. We say it makes our lives easier, but it will hurt us in the long run. Due to our generation’s ignorance, A.I will soon cause generational indolency, leading our world to an uncertain future. Artificial intelligence inhibits human authenticity.
In more recent years, A.I. has become popular in schools. This generation and upcoming generations will lack integrity, personal and social values, and academic knowledge setting us up for failure in the future. Because so many students have become reliant on A.I. to help them through school, many will lack the necessary knowledge for their profession. Having too many people in society who hardly know the basics of a subject that they should’ve been thoroughly informed of in school will end up harming society later on. In Bertalan Mesko’s excerpt in Journal of Medical Internet Research, he explains the attraction to ChatGPT. Within its new version’s launch, the number of user’s rapidly grew. It is used to reduce an individual’s workload causing less stress. ChatGPT is an LLM, large language models, which are used in “education and research, writing, and…journalism.” Their roles in research papers have been questioned, because using A.I. is often times plagiarism leading to copyright infringement. Now moving on from schooling to careers, A.I. is known to inhibit individualism at school and in the workplace environment a lot of the time. In Chao Li’s Does Artificial Intelligence Promote Or Inhibit on-the-Job Learning? Human Reactions to AI at Work, he gives insight about the world’s new “technological revolution”, artificial intelligence. He takes a serious approach to how A.I. harms the world. It can increase productivity but we cannot rely on it for everything, this is where qualified human workers come into play but with A.I., it limits their capabilities. This is important because the growing industry is affecting jobs, something that helps circulate money through the global economy. Money makes the world go round. “AI’s…cost-saving effects can also increase people’s income” Later on, he mentions, “the growing power of artificial intelligence and its increasing status in the workplace…make workers more pessimistic about their future.” But what is the benefit if some people get an increase in pay and many others lose their job? Wouldn’t it be better to have the same pay and most people still with a job? We should practice socialism as an economy to ensure stability.
A.I. can also be ineffective in the workplace because it seems to always affect someone’s job negatively. Elizabeth Fisher’s Occupational Safety and Health Equity Impacts of Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Fisher’s book explains how A.I. is used in the workplace, it is used to fill a number of jobs that humans possessed in the past. Proving that they do steal jobs that humans are fully capable of completing. A.I. can filter applications sent to an employer, it used to increase safety measures, and to increase worker productivity. It monitors human actions at work such as their communication skills and body language. Apparently, workers will benefit from A.I.’s presence in the workplace because it helps to control and limit inequities and improve well-being between employees. However, it does the exact opposite. This new technology limits workers capabilities because a robot is watching them at all times, it instills fear which will cause most to act differently. Fisher believes this advanced technology protects workers from discrimination by employers. Although it says it will not discriminate, how do we know that? It can still be filtered by an employer to reject a certain number of people of a gender, race, nationality, or another undesirable category. According to Fisher, due to our societal ignorance, workers are seen as vulnerable and have modest abilities; however in the right environment people can be brought out of their ‘shell’. Lucas Bellaiche studies psychology and neuroscience at Drake University. He wrote Humans versus AI: whether and why we prefer human-created compared to AI-created artwork. Artist’s are being replaced by A.I. We must protect the original aura of art, including music, art, and literature. Originality and individualism can put a different perspective and manifest human life in a commonly known or another way. This can be achieved by an artist creating a piece that expresses their “inner thoughts, emotions, and experiences” in which the artist and the artwork have a unique, “profound” connection. The unique and ineffable quality that an original work of art possesses due to its authenticity, history, and physical presence in a specific time and place. A.I. art is unoriginal and detaches the “sphere” of tradition and loses the community’s appreciation. If we continue to use A.I. art, we put artists and producers at risk, putting them out of business and we will instead have boring, repeated work to see. Real artists have skill and talent, A.I. doesn’t. It lacks natural ability and originality. This destroys the essence of art, it loses its core value and spirit. Bellaiche believes authentic art has the power to “transcend cultural and temporal boundaries, resonating with people across diverse backgrounds” for generations to come.
A.I. has done a lot of good in this world, it can help inspire thoughts for a “brain dead” student who needs to write a paper for their English class, it creates art, it entertains (ex. TikTok), and it has made so much more contributions to society. A.I. can be useful however, it will and already is blind siding us by hurting us without us being cognisant of it. It steals jobs away from the working class because it is seen as cost-efficient. In fact, A.I. is not any more reliable than humans because it is only as smart as what has already been discovered and programmed into it. We have the same brain as they do a motherboard, humans can explore outside the box while a robot can’t because it is only as smart as you make it. A.I. is a temporary solution to a long-term problem. We should use resources around us to survive and thrive. Humans are the future, not A.I.