“Yet hence arises a grave mischief. The sacredness which attaches to the act of creation -the act of thought- is transferred to the record… The writer was a just and wise spirit: henceforward it is settled, the book is perfect; as love of the hero corrupts into worship of his statue. Instantly, the book becomes noxious: the guide is a tyrant. The sluggish and perverted mind of the multitude, slow to open to the incursions of Reason, having once so opened, having once received this book, stands upon it, and makes an outcry, if it is disparaged. Colleges are built on it. Books are written on it by thinkers, not by Man Thinking; men of talent, that is, who start wrong, who set out from accepted dogmas, not from their own sight of principles…”
-Ralph Waldo Emerson.
Language is an imprecise mechanism engrained to each human being at birth. Within mankind’s long mammalian history, communication of ideas is one of the main evolutionary traits that has allowed the human species to survive. The mirror neurons in the primate brain enabled mankind with the ability to empathize and disseminate information based on body language, tone of voice, facial expressions, and eventually the written word. The progression of the human means of communication has been crucial to the sapience needed for agriculture, education, sciences, and advancement as a species. However, a man who has never seen a tiger may not be able to picture it in his mind purely off description alone. He may find himself only able to imagine the terror a tiger might induce when faced with its fangs head on.
Language is imprecise because of the gap between human experience and human imagination. Where the ability to readily and competently communicate ideas is praised, the actual experiences or substances behind understanding those ideas is often undercut. The challenges the everyday person might face can be described in the best, most accurate terms possible, only to fall short to someone who has not yet experienced those challenges. The words no longer contain the context behind them.
Human beings have great difficulty imagining what they have never been exposed to, so languages and arts were created to fill that void, so that one may become familiar with the unfamiliar. In education, society relies on literature and textbooks to prepare the young and inexperienced for facing the world; these tools are used as guides to fill vulnerable minds with the material they need to survive. Thus, the texts or art itself gain a pedestal, rather than the thoughts, work, and happenings put behind them. This is a common cause for the derision of modern or abstract art, in which an audience member might scoff at Klein’s Blue, in which a square canvas is painted in its entirety with a simple blue paint. The audience is devoid of the context that the mixing of the blue paint and the artist’s method to hide the brushstrokes had been revolutionary in the techniques of the art world. Often, to an audience without the experiences to appreciate the process, the product is worth more than the act of creation.
The knowledgeable scholars of society write down what they already know to warn and inform about potential dangers or sociological findings, such as the Museum of Auschwitz or the post-colonialist Braithwaite’s literature on the lasting effects of colonialism in the Caribbean islands. However, the audience’s lack of experiential knowledge means that these writings are mystified. Intelligence becomes something gifted instead of gained, and intellectualism becomes a religion rather than a practice. Each person reading works like Self Reliance, Women, Race & Class, or Great Expectations can feel as though they are only getting half of the story, like trying to imagine a color based on only its name. Thus, there is the assumption of a special talent within the understanding or writing of these literature. In order to fill these holes, a person must go out to explore and learn the context behind these books for oneself. Texts can only supplement so much knowledge when one refuses to expand their own.
The information of the text or past is not to be diminished simply because it is unable to fully communicate its existence or ideals. There is much to learn from learning what one does not understand, and much to be gained once we gain the tools to do so– as long as we forgo the assumption that procuring knowledge is a chore. The issue lies within the assumption that because it is written by a great man, the text becomes ironclad, never to be expanded upon or disproved, taken merely at face value; past information or philosophies can rather be used to guide individuals forward onto new paths that can come from challenging or recontextualizing old ideals. Knowledge becomes valuable when one puts it into action, or vice versa. The importance of pursuing thought and creativity is what led to those former breakthroughs, and there is surely more left in this world to be unearthed as life begins to expand and move past the structure of previous centuries. Plato was taught by Socrates, but he continued to create his own schools of thought long after Socrates was dead.
The transcription of thought and creativity is critical for the world to keep thinking upon and digesting new ideas or concepts than an individual might have never otherwise been exposed to, but the ability to pull back the curtain and find out where those ideas had come from in the first place is an exercise in autonomy. At certain points, when one does not question the information they are told or where it’s coming from, it can be similar to watching the shadows upon the cave wall.
Reading and writing are two important parts of language, allowing one’s thoughts and ideas to be disseminated, discussed and criticized. However, vast amounts of reading or writing about the world without supplementing one’s knowledge with tangible experiences has the potential to create a blind spot within the scholar. Writing a thousand essays does not matter if one does not do the work to understand what makes a great essayist great. Understanding ideas only in theory often leads to half-thoughts and misinterpretations of complex subjects, creating scholars who write confidently on matters they have never truly examined for themselves. A refusal to question and explore the world is a refusal to develop one’s mind. The things humanity can gain from literature is only as great as what we can gain from remaining curious.
The mystification of what makes a great writer or scholar is egregious. Any human has the ability to access thought, to examine and analyze their perspectives of the world, to study. The great injustice comes from an inability to imagine one’s own intelligence or greatness, which comes from the lack of experience that goes into understanding how greatness is made. This is the most horrid example of the impreciseness of language. When a text or scholar is praised, the inexperienced cannot imagine the work, experience, and effort that goes into it.