My interest in free expression comes from what I see every day as a high school AP U.S. Government teacher and from the way I was raised to think about civic responsibility. I grew up around people who believed you speak up when something is wrong, you ask hard questions, and you do not back down just because a conversation is uncomfortable. That mindset followed me into education and now shapes how I approach both teaching and my path toward law.
In my classroom, free speech is not just something students memorize for a test. It is something they are trying to figure out how to use in real time. A lot of students walk in unsure if their opinions matter, or worried that saying the “wrong” thing will get them shut down socially or academically. I work hard to build a space where students can challenge ideas, debate policy, and disagree respectfully without feeling like they have to shrink themselves to fit in. When students realize they can speak, question authority, and still be taken seriously, you can see their confidence change.
Teaching government right now often feels like a form of everyday, boots on the ground civic advocacy. I design lessons where students tackle real issues, analyze Supreme Court speech cases, and look at how protest, journalism, and dissent actually move societies forward. I make it clear that democracy is not quiet and it is not comfortable. It is built on people being willing to speak, even when it is unpopular. At the same time, I am intentional about making sure students who do not always see themselves reflected in positions of power know their voices belong in these conversations too.
Outside the classroom, I support student journalism, encourage civic engagement, and advocate for keeping schools places where students can talk about real world issues honestly. To me, free expression only works if people are willing to actively protect it, especially for young people who are still learning how their voices fit into civic life.
My academic work in history and global education reinforced this perspective. Studying societies where speech eroded slowly, not all at once, made it clear how fragile expression can be if people assume someone else will defend it. That understanding is a big reason I am pursuing law.
I want to use the law to protect free expression in spaces where power differences are real, including schools, public institutions, and systems that directly affect young people and underserved communities. Free expression, to me, is not just about the right to speak. It is about making sure people feel safe enough to speak and that their voices actually matter when they do.
At the end of the day, I believe people deserve the space to question, challenge, and participate fully in civic life, and I want to spend my career helping protect that right.